The thought of having some of the available prenatal tests available may cause you a little anxiety, and with due cause. Fortunately, the choice as to which tests to have, if any, is always up to the parents.
Before you make your decisions you need to be informed—and there are plenty of hospitals, clinics, labs and doctors who are only too happy to perform tests and generate a great deal of money for performing unnecessary prenatal testing. Your best interests and those of your unborn child are not always at the forefront, and some feel that ethics are lacking.
There are two kinds of tests; invasive and non-invasive. There are inherent risks involved with invasive testing, and the earlier in the pregnancy invasive testing is done, the greater the chances of damage to the fetus and a miscarriage.
The case for or against prenatal testing hinges primarily on the “need” for a test, as well as safety. Some tests are not conclusive at all; you may get a false positive or a false negative result. What then? If tests are designed to aid a professional care provider to make the best decisions for the patient and her baby, but the test results can’t be trusted, is there value in the test? Much of the accuracy of an ultrasonograph, for example, depends on the expertise and opinion of the technician performing the scan; a human being.
Why would I want prenatal tests?
While it’s true that sometimes early insights about what’s going on in a woman’s womb can be beneficial, women have been having healthy babies for eons, without tests, and we’re here to talk about it. If a couple is considered to be in a particularly high risk group for a specific birth defect, and a test can be performed safely and with very minimal risk to mother and fetus, AND the results can be relied upon, then perhaps that is a case for a screening.
Ultrasonographic Imaging
For most young couples very little testing is necessary. Older mothers may run a higher risk of having a baby with Down syndrome, however, and of course there are tests for that. Thankfully, the mother’s blood will usually tell the story. An ultrasonograph can also get a view of the back of the neck of the fetus and may help provide a reliable prognosis in tandem.
Is having an ultrasound “to verify fetal age” s sound medical proposition? Does it really matter how old the fetus is? Will a week or two make that much difference? Doesn’t a woman have enough on her plate without going for unnecessary ultrasonographic testing? Probably, but there’s money in it. If you have an ultrasound you should advise your caregiver whether you want to know the sex or not; otherwise they may insensitively just blurt it out. And what if they’re wrong and you’ve gone and done the nursery and all the baby clothes in pink, when you really needed green and blue?
Amniocentesis
Often a doctor will recommend an amniocentesis between 16 and 18 weeks into the pregnancy. Sticking a 7 ½” needle—no matter that it’s .8 mm wide—through the abdominal wall and into the amniotic sac is invasive, to both mother and baby.
Why would this procedure be requested? If there is a high risk of certain conditions that result from abnormal or damaged chromosomes, amniocentesis is nearly always accurate. However, the specific defect under consideration must be known because roughly one hundred different defects can be isolated. If they’re looking for Down syndrome or spina bifida, they have to look for that up front when doing the lab work or they won’t find it.
Amniocentesis will NOT detect structural defects in the heart wall or hip formation, for example, which are not a result of chromosome abnormalities. And then there are multiple reasons why things could go wrong in the lab and provide an incorrect result. When you consider that the verdict could be cause for a couple to terminate a pregnancy, is it worth having the test?
What are the risks? One woman who did significant research into the procedure has asked, If you wouldn’t abort, why would you even think about amnio? When you’re informed, you know that any outside interference into the baby’s sterile environment bears risk—for both mother and fetus. Here are some of the recognized possible outcomes:
- Fetal damage
- Hemorrhage
- Amniotic fluid leak
- Risk of miscarriage
- Bleeding and cramps
- Uterine infection
- Rh sentization
- Ear problems
- Increased visits to neonatal intensive care
- Clubfoot
Clearly, a superior, less invasive method is required to assess fetal development that doesn’t pose such high risks. A company called Sequenom, which specializes in genetic analysis products is currently developing invitro prenatal testing that fills the bill. Their new products will open up the status of fetal gene and chromosome abnormalities in trimesters one and two with minimal risk to the baby using Fetal Nucleic Acid Technology.
There are no guarantees about anything in life, so it’s unrealistic to look for guarantees in a pregnancy. A positive outlook and a reverence for the new life inside—no matter what may be the outcome—is the best insurance policy for parents.